Alan Sabrosky: We CAN bust Israel for 9/11 – here’s how!

Alan Sabrosky will discuss his excellent new series of articles on the Kevin Barrett Show this Tuesday, July 5th, 9 – 10 a.m. Pacific (11 a.m.-noon Central) at NoLiesRadio.org (archived here a few hours after broadcast).

Read his new article Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake.

Then read Alan Sabrosky’s article Israel’s Hidden Faces, A Long Day’s Night for Us All — an article based on the slideshow he is urging us to present to local veterans’ organizations, as explained at the end of the interview transcribed below, which you can listen to at http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Truth-Jihad-32k-031111.mp3 .

Welcome to Truth Jihad Radio…My first hour guest is Dr. Alan Sabrosky, Ph.D. from the University of Michigan, the former Director of Studies of the Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College…and he’s well-known — and in some quarters notorious (laughter) — for laying it on the line and saying, “Hey, Mossad did 9/11, with some help from Cheney and Rumsfeld and those guys, but basically this was a Mossad operation.” And there are people who just don’t want to hear that. And you can imagine why. But I appreciate that kind of straightforward, pull-no-punches straight talk. Truth-telling, laying it on the line, telling it like it is…that’s what I like, and that’s why I like Dr. Alan Sabrosky. Welcome, Alan, to Truth Jihad Radio.

Thank you Kevin, how are you doing?

I’m doing well today, looking forward to this show. It’s been awhile…was it about a year ago or so that you were last on?

Yes it was, and it was entirely my fault. I had gone thirty years in a row without having any physical injuries, and then three in a row in a period of four months, ending up with a torn rotator cuff in my left shoulder, which is not a joy. It takes awhile to get back from that sort of thing. But yes, I’m back, you saw my latest article, and I have three more coming out over the next three weeks.

That’s fantastic. The print version (of the latest article) is in Veterans Today, quite an extraordinary veterans publication…what’s with Veterans Today, Alan? You’ve been hanging around Gordon Duff and the people at Veterans Today for a while. How in the world did America’s leading veterans’ publication turn into such a strident 9/11 truth, and truth-telling in general, kind of operation?

Well, first of all, I wouldn’t say it’s strident…

Okay, that’s the wrong adjective.

Yeah, and it’s not focusing on 9/11. It’s actually an attempt — and I’m going to say this as someone who, while I’m an editor, I have not been actively involved in the planning and structure of Veterans Today. But this is my impression: It’s an attempt to bring together at least two of the major themes in the community that is in opposition to the whole host of Israeli-Zionist bits of militarism, activities, and actions. One is in the United States and mostly focused on 9/11. And although people might not like to hear this, for almost all Americans, even if they knew what the Israelis were doing to Palestine, most of them wouldn’t care. They really wouldn’t. They, like most other people, are mostly concerned with what is done to them. And that’s 9/11, which is an open wound, and the wars that came from it. 

Internationally, it’s the reverse. People there are obviously aware of 9/11, they understand the implications for the United States, but when I speak with friends in Germany or Britain or France  or various Latin American countries — for them it’s Palestine and Gaza. And 9/11 is sort of a secondary issue. And what I see in Veterans Today is a powerful set of writings, some by editors and more-or-less-regular contributors, others outside of it, who put both of them side by side. So that the readership of Veterans Today will get good arguments on 9/11, but they’ll also get good arguments on Israeli policy and its manipulation of American governmental policy on Palestine and collateral issues. And that I think is important. 

Very well-put. And as an American Muslim, I’m concerned with Palestine, I’m concerned with the US, I’m concerned with 9/11 — it’s an open wound in more ways than one for those of us who are Muslims and American citizens. And I’m also concerned with false-flag terror being blamed on Muslims everywhere you go. Everyone from Hosni Mubarak in Alexandria to DEA-CIA agent David Headley over in India…everywhere you go it seems that somebody’s blowing something up and killing people and blaming Muslims. And I’m sick of it.

Well…I certainly agree with you. And I think those of us who look at the issues understand the linkage between them. And when I say “those of us” I don’t mean just you and me, I mean those of us in the community…I’m not going to use the word “activist” because I truly hate it. But those of us who are concerned about what America is in the world, the American place in the world, the extent to which Israelis dominate and manipulate American governmental policy…and whether it’s manifested in a 9/11 cover-up, or a cover-up of their actions in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead, or third parts of the world, we’re aware of it. 

But the general public in any given country really isn’t that differentiated. And if the information were there, if we said listen, we’re going to really show you what the Israelis did in Cast Lead, most people would say “Yep, too bad” and get on with their lives. The thing that has been a constant concern of mine, and this — with the “9/11 truth issue” as well as the general anti-Zionist perspective — is that we have all been sort of like a gaggle of duck hunters standing in a circle, blasting birdshot outward and upward in a thousand different directions and on a thousand or more issues, in so much detail that not only do none of us really understand it, the general public in America and elsewhere doesn’t even know that these are issues, and is hopelessly confused at best, and totally turned-off at worst. 

And that is the generic problem. It affects the 9/11 debate. It affects the debate on Gaza. It affects the debate on issues outside of that, as you mentioned. And there’s an absence of focus. There’s an absence of a sense of what German strategists called the Schwerpunkt: the strategic center of gravity. And it’s on that that we need to focus. And none of us is really doing that. And when I say “us” I’m including myself. And I have been trying, in part with the piece I sent off to you, and more specifically in the ones that are coming after that, to try to develop a kind of strategic focus. And I believe I’ve done that.  There is a little syllogism that I have come up with that I think really explains this, or at least explains it to me — and that may be a sign of my lack of understanding — but it goes something like this:

That is the issue. And not all the other issues that people talk about: Academic freedom on the campuses — yes, it’s important, but it’s not the core issue. 9/11 is the Schwerpunkt of this entire exercise. This is the one that turns the United States around in its approach to the world. This is the one that’s an open wound. This, and the wars which came from it, are the ones that concern Americans today. Bodies don’t come home in coffins because of a lack of academic freedom or the suppression of Norman Finklestein. Bodies come home because of the wars. The wars evolved from 9/11. Pin 9/11 on the Israelis, and this entire exercise begins to unravel for them.  My personal conviction — and you understand as a former Marine, I always pull my punches and speak in a very wishy-washy way (laughter)…

You and Gordon (Duff) both have that problem. 

Our former men always thought, “there’s a real softie up there,” you know. Though I have to say, if one of my former Marines saw me walking around with one of my kittens on my shoulder, they’d probably say “we never really knew him.” (laughter)  But here’s my conclusion on this. If — and I acknowledge it’s a big if — a classic grass-roots approach, something like the so-called Tea Party used, could persuade enough people at the local level in the United States, that Israel and its supporters here orchestrated 9/11, and thus the wars that ensued from 9/11, and are therefore responsible for the lives and treasure and loss of personal freedom Americans have experienced — that doesn’t even count what we’ve done to others — then AIPAC and company are dead meat figuratively, politically, and quite possibly literally as well. And I think that applies to people who’ve supported them. And I tell you very frankly, at that point, the Israelis wouldn’t just have to worry about a loss of US vetoes and military aid, they would very likely have to start dusting off their contingency plans for the Fifth and Sixth US fleets and associated US Air Force units. And they might want to start reflecting on pictures of Dresden and Tokyo and just how (Israel) would look afterwards.

These kind of images, Alan, are what scare some Americans, and not just hard-core Zionists, away from looking into this scenario. Here in Madison, Wisconsin, I’ve been trying to convince people in Madison to look into 9/11, and I’ve been kind of nudging them to look at Israel’s role, for years. And the liberal academic establishment, the government workers, the people who are now staging the Wisconsin Revolution…a lot of them will look into it, but the Israeli part has actually been a major hindrance. It certainly whipped up a lot of hatred of me, personally, as well as resistance to the truth movement. How do we get over that?

Well, a lot of that has occurred because so much of the 9/11 truth movement is so diffuse, and the constant calls for “proof, proof, where’s the proof, we need more proof, we need more evidence”…and, dear God, the evidence is there in abundance! As I mentioned in that piece I sent you, we’ve got everything but a public confession. And if you take the Dancing Israelis’ interview on Israeli television when they got back, you’ve got an acknowledgment if not a confession. It’s that no one here, no large number of people here, really accept the Israeli role in 9/11. It’s one of so many possible interpretations out there. The 9/11 truth movement, or what’s loosely called that, has an awful lot of people who spend an awful lot of time presenting fairly ridiculous hypotheses. I’ve read one, you know, that it was really the Martians, it truly was —(laughter)

That was probably Alfred Webre.

—all under the same umbrella, and with a remarkable lack of consensus, and talking about everything from the composition of a building to cruise missiles into the Pentagon and onward. The people can’t deal with that. No public can. Not an American public which is remarkably ahistorical. But I don’t think a general public anywhere can. The Zionists have a much better sense of how to do these things. They understand that slogans and street theater are not a substitute for strategy. 

Let me stop you for just a second here, because I think there is a consensus in the truth movement, in the sense that looking at the neocons — Cheney and Rumsfeld and Cheney’s advisors, the PNAC people, Project for a New American Century — everybody’s pointing at those people. And then the question is: When you say “This looks like a Mossad operation, here’s the evidence,” which I have been doing for years, you get a lot of psychological resistance, for various reasons. But ultimately they end up saying “How could a small country like Israel do something like this? Wasn’t it the big American empire? And aren’t these neocons and PNAC people agents of the big American empire, and therefore isn’t it mean and nasty and anti-Semitic to blame the Israelis?”

All you have to do is — and I’m saying “all” with quotation marks, and I want to get back to your images in just a second — but all that’s really necessary at that point is to look at domination of the media…I just finished, for example, looking at and posting on youtube about a ten-minute mp4 of real-time audio and video clips from 9/11, on the site. And (we heard) constantly, from multiple networks, multiple emergency response people, multiple survivors, about the secondary explosions on the ground level. You can hear them going off. That did not reach the American people after that first day. Look at who controls the media. Take that little chart that I gave you, that I included in that: 

This was the media in 2001-2002, this is what it is today, that’s why you can’t hear it.

Money. Campaign contributions. And it could be done by anyone. It’s just that they do it. 

If the Arab countries, particularly the wealthier oil-producing countries, had decided to put less funds into modernization and luxuries, and put the same amount of money into building a complementary equivalent to AIPAC, and buying out the media on the open market, they could be doing it too. They just haven’t. 

But money and media are the two key parts. And that degree of leverage is not at all unusual. I mean, I could imagine someone several hundred years ago saying, “How could one small city on the hills overlooking the Tiber rule this empire? There’s got to be something else there.”

And you know, for images, Kevin — and I understand those images, and I use those particular images (of the US bombing Israel in retaliation for 9/11) very cautiously — one thing we know, that we need to think about — and I am very aware of some of the comments that you got after our interview a year ago — if in fact (and let’s put this hypothetically at this point) — if in fact Israel, working with its neocon supporters and whoever else might have been involved within the United States, did in fact orchestrate 9/11 — let’s take that as a hypothesis — then they, the Israelis, are directly or indirectly responsible for 67,000 Americans dead and wounded to date, and God knows how many people killed, wounded, dispossessed, made refugees in other countries…and they’re trying to do it to a third country, Iran. They deserve, as a matter of justice, something more than a rhetorical slap on the wrist and an injunction not to do it again.

Well, I can’t disagree with that. This is Kevin Barrett talking with Alan Sabrosky. Back in a minute.

(commercial break)

* * *

Barrett (over fading bumper music: Poker Face, “I’d Rather Die than Be Your Slave”)

That was Poker Face, the great rock and roll band that tells the truth about 9/11 and the Israeli-Zionist connection to 9/11, in no uncertain terms — like my guest today, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, who is the author of a new article at Veterans Today: “Israel’s Hidden Faces: A Long Day’s Night for Us All” which outlines what he’s been saying today. Alan, the last time you were on, the biggest reaction I got from people who weren’t on board with it was: “Is this really proof?” I think they’re scared off by…well, we’re all taught that Jewish people have been falsely blamed for all sorts of things, and ruthlessly persecuted. And when they hear you saying these things, and saying “God knows what might happen to these AIPAC people once Americans figure this out,” the reaction is: “We don’t want to blame the Israeli Mossadnik Zionists unless we have really strong proof.” Where is that proof?

Well, I think in a very direct way, it’s in WTC-7. As I remarked to someone, this is not a smoking gun, it’s a smoking artillery brigade. When I was running through the analysis on this — and by the way, there’s my very detailed look at 9/11 in one of the three pieces that are coming out over the next three weeks — I almost postponed this interview so we could wait until they were out. So this is a little anticipatory. So I sat down and I said, “What would it take for anyone…” Not starting off by saying “it was Mossad, let’s prove it’s Mossad,” that’s a silly point of view. If you wanted to start off to prove Mother Goose did something, you could probably fabricate enough stuff to point to the poor Goose lady.  But you look at this and you say, what would it take for anyone (to do 9/11). Well, obviously the first thing it takes is some sort of motivation or incentive. And the sad thing about it is, there are an awful lot of people out in the world now, and an awful lot countries and an awful lot of movements who hate the United States, and unfortunately they have very good reason to do so. But for most of them, the motivation would be negative. They would want revenge, they would want to hurt the United States, they would want to acquire retribution for some actual or assumed acts of the United States in the past. But they’re essentially negative and punitive. The only country out there that would have a positive incentive to do it was Israel. And that was in keeping with the basic PNAC thesis, that there needs to be a catalytic event to mobilize the American people. 

I always thought the (PNAC) project was mis-named. The Project for a New American Century? It was really the Project for a New ISRAELI Century, and America’s Role in It. 

That’s a good point. There’s the earlier document the same (PNAC) people put out for Netanyahu, “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Defending the Realm.” And it’s obvious whose realm they’re talking about defending. 

Exactly. Exactly. And for whom they wrote it.